The US Constitution and "Deism"

[Paul A Drockton M.A.]

http://www.moneyteachers.org/US.Constitution.htm

[ZenHG]

I am not entirely convinced by this article, Mr. Drockton, I do apologize, but in my studies I have found time and again that George Washington was a Mason and various signers of the declaration of independence were Masons.
The constitution and bill of rights were formulated on this model, as a Mason could be both a Mason and a Christian, at least in the view of a Mason, but they were a Mason first and foremost, which did not exclude God, or the Grand Architect as they refer to him/it.
One can make all sorts of speculation about what goes on behind closed doors, but the reality is that we don't really know unless we can get inside, until then, it is nothing more than speculation, some speculation has supporting fact, other forms of speculation are less credible.

The fact that George Washington attended Church does not mean he was a good Christian, and the fact that he was a Mason does not mean he was an evil person.
I am not altogether convinced that the Masons or the Gnostics are the source of evil in the world, nor the Illuminati, these are fronts, the Illuminati was a direct response to the repressive Catholic Church and an extention of Freemasonry, or vice versa, not necessarily an evil cabal.
The Bill of rights states freedom of religion, this is a cornerstone of the above mentioned groups, and in the case of the Illuminati, freedom from opressive religion, namely, a church that executes people for investigating and asking questions, then proving something to be contrary to the accepted norm promoted by Rome.

I, personally, would be more apt to look at Religion itself with suspicion, as religion itself asks a person to put their trust in what is 'outside' rather than what is 'inside.'
So you can see the very Gnostic nature of the bill of rights, self-empowerment, self-governance, self-determination, self-realization, would that not make it selfish by its' very nature? Now, there is a point where this can go overboard and truly become an evil thing, but ultimately it is meant as a path of self-discovery and actualization of potential.
Trust in what is 'outside' is sort of like what is happening right now, handing yourself over to a Governing body, doing what you are supposed to be doing, as dictated by the forces above (in this case Government becomes synonymous with God, and this is not contrary to what is written in the modern Bible, regardless of denomination/sect).
This sounds more like what is written about in Plato's Republic.

Regardless, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were definitely an opposing force to the present state of affairs, but it was written by Mason and Non-Mason alike, yet leans heavily toward Masonic Philosophy/belief.
So why would the Illuminati/Masons, Gnostics, find their own work to be a threat unless those currently pulling the strings are not the Illuminati/Masons, or the Masons/Illuminati of today are not the same as those of yesterday, ie, they have all been whiped out by an opposing force from within.
Today we have the Skull and Bones society that pretty much calls the shots in America and has produced the CIA, along with United States Presidents, Senators, ect., they are in control of everything at a high level, they make the laws.
This is another front, these are nothing more than false fronts to throw a bone to people like us who notice such things; the truth is far different, perhaps even stranger than what we think it is, and you can be it is not at all what we think.

In my view, everything is a front, set up for a purpose, not necessarily by a single group either, but different factions that come together for a common cause, is that to create a one world Government? Things would seem to be leaning that way, but whatever is visible to the eye often hides the true purpose as what is invisible is not easily discernable unless you know what you are looking for.
Certainly there are adept occultists, ultimately it boils down to masters of strategy, of deception, these are principles of warfare, you move one way in order to get the attention of your opponent while you move another force up behind them to deal them the death blow while they are distracted.
It does not need to be so complicated, in fact, the reason things seem complicated is part of the distraction. It is one big game.

Of course I could be wrong about all this, however, evidence, if you read between the lines, points to correctness on some level.