In the previous article we discussed how Rothschild owned Shell Oil stands accused of covering up the immensity of safety concerns on its North Sea Oil Platforms, and how The Scottish Lord High Advocate, Elish Angelioni, stands as a Rothschild puppet. We also quoted from sources that accuse the Lord High Advocate of obstructing justice in the death of two Scotsmen on one of Shell's oil platforms.
In a remarkable coincidence, Sheriff Patrick Davies, who has falsely imprisoned and censored journalist Robert Green for exposing a high-level Aberdeen pedophile ring, and illegally impeded Robert Green's run for Parliament, also ruled in Shell's favor on the high profile oil platform deaths. Sheriff Davies and Elish Angelioni both seem to have assisted Shell Oil and the Rothschilds in limiting the damage from safety issues regarding the North Sea Oil Platforms.
One mistake that many make, is assuming that a politician is acting on his own behalf, when in fact, he or she may be acting on behalf of a corrupt corporation run be Satanic Psychopaths. If this is the case with Scotland's politicians, it could explain the mysterious link between Angelioni, Davies and the Hollie Greig Case.
"Levy & McRae, the legal firm which represented Elish Angiolini, the Lord Advocate - Scotland’s most senior law officer - last month took The Drum to the Press Complaints Commission and lost.
The online article at the root of the dispute, which we publish on the following pages in full in addition to the PCC adjudication, was a report on a failed Freedom of Information request. Last year the Lord Advocate threatened to sue our sister magazine The Firm for reporting complaints from the family of Hollie Greig, a young Down’s Syndrome child and victim of an alleged paedophile ring." (Source)
What if, as she has done in so many other instances, the Lord Advocate was not acting on her own behalf? If, as in the cases mentioned in my previous articles, she is just a puppet controlled by the Rothschild family and Shell Oil, then what is the probability that she is also acting in their interests in obstructing justice, and preventing exposure, of high-level Pedophile rings?
Another serious question deals with Sheriff Patrick Davies. Davies is the Aberdeen Judge who is accused of conspiring with Angelioni and Rothschild agents to prevent other lawsuits over North Sea Oil platform safety concerns. He has also played a leading role in suppressing the Hollie Greig case and obstructing Robert Green's attempts to make the story public. In the words of Robert Green:
“On 20th April the Returning Officer formally accepted my candidature, there being no objections. I thence applied to Stonehaven Sheriff Court for a temporary variation on my bail conditions to allow me free access to the constituency for the period running up to and including election day,” the letter reads.
“This was heard in camera at the court before Sheriff Davies on 30th April. My application was refused by the Sheriff on two grounds, first that I did not belong to, to quote the Sheriff, “a proper professional party”, despite the SACL for which I stood being a properly constituted and recognised political party, and secondly that my appearance on the streets of Aberdeen South might lead to civil unrest." (Source)
Interestingly enough, Sheriff Davies was himself responsible for creating "civil unrest" when an angry mob formed outside his courtroom over his ridiculously light sentence on the head of the worst kind of pedophile:
"Kieron Hodgson was found to have 80 photographs and videos on computers and discs at his Auchenblae home between June 2004 and March 2007.
Some of the images were rated as the most severe of their type.
At Stonehaven Sheriff Court yesterday, Hodgson was sentenced to three years’ supervised probation and ordered to do 195 hours of unpaid work in the community. He was escorted from the court by police officers as a small but hostile group gathered outside.
The 26-year-old’s computer was being investigated in connection with a separate case when police uncovered his links to websites which allow people to pay for sexual images of children. The court heard previously that videos of girls between two and 14, and one video of a young boy, were found on discs at Hodgson’s home at Roselea, Inverurie Street.
Passing sentence, Sheriff Patrick Davies said: “I have concluded that the interests of society would be better served by a lengthy probation order. I take the view that a relatively lengthy period of imprisonment would provide the punishment and do nothing to overcome the problem.” (Source)
There you have it folks, a judge that prosecutes those that investigate high-level pedophiles, and permits those that are caught in the act of pedophilia to go forth and commit further outrages. The fact that international pedophile rings exist, involving high-level members of society, is no longer a matter for speculation:
"Dozens of men - including community leaders, a police officer, a teacher and a youth worker - have been arrested over child pornography and abuse offences after the nation's biggest anti-pedophile investigation.
The six-month joint operation by the Australian Federal Police and state police forces uncovered several cases of child molestation and highlighted the astonishing way in which pedophiles form secret communities in cyberspace and use the global reach of the internet to trade child-exploitation images." (Source)
What the recent Australian crackdown illustrates, is that the images of child sexual exploitation are extremely valuable to a very large, online pedophile community.
How big is this "community"? The Australian case gives us a glimpse of its enormity and magnitude:
"Dubbed Operation Centurion, the investigation was triggered after a hacker infiltrated a respectable European website and inserted 99 degrading and explicit images of young girls from Eastern Europe, the US and Paraguay.
The site, which cannot be named for legal reasons, was besieged by an incredible 12 million hits in just 76 hours after word got around online pedophile networks." (Ibid)
A pedophile like Hodgeson, who was given parole by Sheriff Davies, was most definitely in a position to name names and expose other Scottish purveyors of such images. Was this the reason Sheriff Davis gave him such a light sentence? Did Hodgeson agree to keep his mouth shut? Or was he working for a higher power?